This dashboard tracks how trade policy is shaping the global green transition. Its purpose is diagnostic: to assess the extent to which governments' trade and industrial policy choices support or undermine the shift away from fossil fuels. All indicators and visualisations are derived directly from GTA intervention records and CLAIRK's database of FTA environmental provisions.
This section tracks governments' support measures targeting green goods as defined in the methodology, identifying which countries are most actively backing the green transition through trade and industrial policy.
This section tracks trade agreements that incorporate environmental provisions and the expanding network of bilateral green commitments.
This section examines the continued use of fossil fuel support policies alongside the global expansion of green industrial measures.
This section explores the growing use of trade defence instruments and export restrictions linked to green goods and strategic minerals.
The dashboard combines static data on free trade agreements with dynamic intervention-level data from the GTA API.
All dynamic indicators include measures covering the product groups specified in the "Product groups" section. All product groups use the HS Nomenclature 2022 version at the 6-digit level.
For GTA-based indicators, the relevant records are filtered to interventions announced from 1 January 2020 onward. The GTA fields used are intervention ID, announcement date, implementing jurisdiction, GTA evaluation, intervention type, MAST chapter, affected jurisdiction, affected product, in-force status, and rationale.
For each implementing jurisdiction and year, the number of liberalising (green GTA evaluation) and harmful (red or amber) interventions on green goods are counted. Net = liberalising minus harmful. A positive value indicates more liberalising; a negative value the opposite.
Counts qualifying green sector support measures since 2020 by implementing jurisdiction: harmful subsidies, liberalising import barrier measures, and liberalising export control measures on green goods, hydrogen, or strategic minerals.
Annual counts of interventions announced from 1 January 2020 onward affecting green goods, hydrogen, or strategic minerals, split by harmful vs liberalising.
Counts interventions citing "climate change mitigation" or "sustainability and circular economy" as stated motive, grouped by announcement year.
Shows how interventions on green goods HS codes are distributed across stated motive categories, including "no stated motive" for interventions without a relevant motive.
Counts interventions per jurisdiction where the stated motive includes climate change mitigation and/or sustainability. Includes both harmful and liberalising interventions.
Built using CLAIRK database data. Each observation identifies a free trade agreement, the partner countries covered, the agreement year, and whether it includes environmental commitments. The chord diagram shows country pairs covered by such agreements.
Total number of distinct agreements in the CLAIRK database that contain environmental commitments.
Countries are counted as covered if party to at least one qualifying agreement. For EU-level agreements, each EU member state receives the full EU count.
Counts interventions announced from 2020 that affect coal, oil, gas, or petrochemical products, are classified as subsidies under MAST Chapter L, and are currently in force.
Annual series of MAST Chapter L subsidy interventions for fossil fuels and for green goods/hydrogen/strategic minerals.
Share of fossil fuel subsidy measures citing "resilience/security of supply" and/or "strategic competitiveness" as stated motive, by year.
Counts anti-dumping, anti-subsidy, safeguard, and anti-circumvention interventions affecting green goods, by implementing jurisdiction.
Counts export control interventions affecting lithium, cobalt, nickel, copper, graphite, and rare earths, by announcement year.
Share of environmentally motivated interventions (citing climate change mitigation or sustainability) that carry a red or amber GTA evaluation.
Share of strategic mineral export controls citing "resilience/security of supply" out of all strategic mineral export controls since 2020.
850610, 850630, 850640, 850650, 850660, 850680, 850690, 850710, 850720, 850730, 850750, 850760, 850780, 850790
392690, 700991, 700992, 730431, 730441, 730451, 730890, 850110, 850120, 850131, 850132, 850133, 850134, 850161–164, 850239, 850300, 850440, 854142, 854143…
730820, 730890, 848210–280, 850161–164, 850231, 850421–434, 853710, 853720, 854442, 854449, 854460…
870380, 854142, 854143, 850231, 280410, 854330, 252100, 252220, 281610, 701990, 841410–490, 841780…
282520, 283691
260500, 282200, 810520, 810530, 810590
260400, 282540, 720260, 750110–620
250410, 250490
280530, 284610, 284690
260300, 262030, 740100–741014
270111, 270112, 270119, 270120, 270210, 270220, 270300, 270400
270900, 271012–020, 271111–129, 271210–290, 271311–390
290121–244, 290211–250, 390110–760, 400219–259…
For inquiries related to the scope and presentation of the contents of this dashboard, please get in touch.
anaelena.sancho@sgept.org